Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Hospital Staffing Contracts topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hospital staffing amendment continued after heated public comment from nurses

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Budget & Finance Committee · December 8, 2021
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee continued consideration of DPH's Cross Country Staffing contract amendment after nurses and supervisors criticized overruns and reliance on registry staff; item was continued to the call of the chair for more data and alignment with ongoing staffing hearings.

The Budget and Finance Committee on Dec. 8 continued consideration of a proposed third amendment to the Department of Public Health's Cross Country Staffing contract after extended debate and public comment from frontline nurses.

DPH representatives (including Jennifer Bosey, Chief Financial Officer for Zuckerberg San Francisco General) explained the request: a roughly $59.7 million increase that would raise the contractauthority to about $85.6 million and extend the contract two years through June 30, 2024. DPH said the increase covers actual registry use related to COVID responses and anticipated rate increases for registry personnel.

Frontline nurses who called in described chronic understaffing and warned that reliance on registry staffing was not a sustainable solution for patient safety. One nurse speaker urged a "no" vote, saying the registry model produces short-term coverage at the expense of permanent staffing and continuity of care. Supervisors pressed DPH on contract oversight after authors acknowledged the contract had already exceeded a prior not-to-exceed level.

Supervisor Safaie said she could not support the request in its current form, citing that the department had already exceeded prior contract authority and recommending the department return with a narrower or shorter-term proposal and fuller explanation of why the overrun occurred.

DPH staff said they would provide more detailed actuals and projections and described recruitment improvements that reduced hiring timelines. Chair Haney moved to continue the item to the call of the chair to align the discussion with broader staffing hearings; the motion carried unanimously in committee.

What happens next: DPH will compile detailed actuals, hiring and leave data, and revised projection scenarios and return at a later hearing; the item remains open and will not be forwarded to the full Board until the committee directs it.