Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Mental Health topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Supervisors press DPH for more review of MHSA annual update; item continued to July 15

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Government Audit & Oversight Committee · July 1, 2021
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supervisors raised concerns about whether the Mental Health Services Act update sufficiently addresses the scale of behavioral‑health needs; Department of Public Health staff said the state required a June 30 submission and will seek an extension, and the committee voted to continue the update to July 15 for further review.

At a July 1 hearing, the Government Audit & Oversight Committee heard the Department of Public Health’s annual update to the county’s Mental Health Services Act (MHSA) three‑year plan and agreed to continue consideration so supervisors could review a 200‑plus page update in more depth.

Tracy Helton, interim MHSA director, described MHSA as a state‑regulated fund (a 1% tax on income above $1 million) that made up about 7.9% of the Department of Behavioral Health (BHS) budget in FY19–20 and supports 87 programs serving roughly 36,807 unduplicated clients that year. Helton highlighted new innovation projects and a five‑year, $5.4 million innovation product aimed at culturally congruent practices for Black and African American communities.

Several supervisors said the report did not, by itself, answer whether the city’s response matches need. “It feels like our house is on fire,” Supervisor Rafael Mandelmann said, urging more discussion of strategy and oversight. Vice Chair Connie Chan said she supports continuing the item to allow committee members to digest the report. DPH staff told the committee the state requires a board‑approved annual update by June 30 and that they would request an extension to allow further local review. After public comment criticizing timing and responsiveness, the committee unanimously voted to continue the item to the July 15 meeting.

The continuation preserves the department’s option to seek a state extension; the full board will consider the annual update after the committee’s follow‑up work.