Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Committee Votes Roundup topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee forwards multiple contract amendments and interim budgets; participatory budgeting transfer advanced

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee · June 8, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee approved forwarding a package of technology contract amendments, the District 7 participatory budgeting de‑appropriation, the special tax district accessibility change, and interim budget ordinances to the full Board with positive recommendations or continuation to further hearings.

At a single action the committee moved a number of items to the full Board or to subsequent hearings. Notable outcomes included:

- Item 1 (20 Fifth & Connecticut ground lease): forwarded to full Board with positive recommendation (see separate article). - Item 2 (amendment to Special Tax District 2009‑1 for accessibility financing): forwarded with a positive recommendation. - Item 3 (de‑appropriation of $300,000 to implement District 7 participatory budgeting projects): forwarded with a positive recommendation; public comment urged better project follow‑up and accountability to ensure awarded funds are spent on the intended projects. - Items 5–12 (technology marketplace contract amendments and new Tier 1B contracts): committee approved forwarding eight resolutions related to contract cap increases and new contracts; OCA staff and controller's office reported large cumulative contract caps and projected expenditures. - Items 14–17 (interim budgets and related ordinances): controller and audit staff recommended approval with an amendment to section 31 affecting item 16; the committee accepted the amendment and moved items 14–17 to the full Board with a positive recommendation.

Motions on these items were generally taken "without objection," and where technical amendments were proposed they were scheduled for further committee work or Rules Committee review.