Get email alerts on the Government Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee backs civil grand jury continuity recommendations and asks for process improvements
Summary
The committee accepted the continuity-report recommendations to improve follow‑up on civil grand jury findings, urging ordinance and admin‑code changes and committing to continue recommendations until final status, while noting existing controller reporting responsibilities.
The Government Audit and Oversight Committee heard a continuity report from the civil grand jury on Sept. 19 that called for stronger follow‑through on prior grand jury findings and recommendations. Nona Russell, chair of the continuity report, said responses are often incomplete or lack implementation timeframes and recommended that the Board adopt an ordinance (by 06/30/2020) and amend Administrative Code section 2.1 to require continued tracking until recommendations reach final status.
Kelly Kirkpatrick of the Mayor’s Budget Office and Mark De La Rosa of the Controller’s Office acknowledged shortcomings in the current process and supported improvements such as standardized response forms and expanded controller reporting. De La Rosa explained that the controller’s office currently gathers department information and issues an annual report on status updates under Admin Code section 2.1.
After public comment from former and current grand jurors urging ongoing continuity, Chair Marr read and the committee adopted amendments recognizing the civil grand jury’s work and committing the Board to continue recommendations until they reach final status. The committee recommended the resolution as amended to the full board and filed the hearing.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.
