Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tall Building Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

City unveils tall-building seismic-safety strategy with 16 recommendations after Millennium Tower scrutiny

Government Audit and Oversight Committee · October 17, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A multi-agency tall-building safety strategy — the first of its kind nationally — maps 156 buildings over 240 feet, proposes short-, mid- and long-term actions (foundations guidance, welded-moment-frame inspection, BORP expansion and downtown recovery planning) and recommends administrative bulletins and code changes to improve post-quake inspections and resilience.

Supervisor Peskin introduced a broad, multi-department tall-building safety strategy — developed with an Applied Technology Council (ATC) team and the Office of Resilience — after concerns raised by the Millennium Tower settlement. The team released 16 recommendations grouped into short-, mid- and long-term actions and published a tall-building inventory (buildings above 240 feet; 156 entries) on the city data portal.

Key near-term recommendations include issuing administrative bulletins and enforcing post-earthquake inspection procedures (FEMA/ATC guidance) to look systematically for damage that may not be immediately evident in welded steel moment frames (less-visible fractures discovered after Northridge). The ATC team also recommended specialized postquake inspection teams for tall buildings and extensions to the Building Occupancy Resumption Program (BORP) to pre-certify engineers and accelerate green/yellow/red tagging and functional recovery.

A geotechnical lead proposed an administrative-bulletin companion to AB 83 focused on foundation-design guidance for tall buildings: acceptable total and differential settlement limits, required field investigations, laboratory testing, numerical-modeling practices, design of shoring/dewatering, and sea-level-rise considerations. ATC estimated localized peer review and adoption could take roughly 6–12 months for an AB-level guidance document.

DBI and the City Administrator said some recommendations can be implemented administratively immediately (peer-review use in permit evaluations and BORP expansion), while others will require code amendments in the 2019 triennial building-code update. Supervisors asked DBI to prepare legislative packages for items requiring board action and to work with stakeholders on implementation and cost-recovery where appropriate. The committee continued the matter to the call of the chair to advance implementation steps.