Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Eviction Reporting topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances ordinance requiring eviction reporting from city‑funded housing providers

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee · January 7, 2015
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Board of Supervisors Budget & Finance Committee advanced an ordinance Jan. 7 that would require recipients of city‑funded housing contracts to submit annual, de‑identified reports on eviction filings and removals; departments will compile portfolio reports. An amendment to add flexibility to reporting requirements was adopted and the item was approved as amended.

Chair Mark Farrell on Wednesday introduced an ordinance, co‑sponsored by Supervisor Breed, that would require recipients of city‑funded contracts for the administration or development of housing to submit annual reports on eviction activity in units the city funds.

Farrell said the ordinance is aimed at better understanding evictions from publicly funded units that house vulnerable residents, including SROs, master‑lease rooms, supportive housing sites and housing authority properties that received local funds. The required reports would list the number of unlawful detainers filed and the reasons for filings, the number of tenants and households removed and the reason for eviction; the ordinance explicitly protects personally identifying information, Farrell said.

Farrell said the Department of Public Health, the Human Services Agency and the Mayor's Office of Housing would collect data from housing partners and compile annual reports for their respective portfolios. He also said the legislation encourages — but cannot mandate — housing providers to submit past eviction statistics because of federal preemption concerns.

The committee adopted a set of minor amendments to provide reporting flexibility for some providers and then approved the ordinance as amended without objection. Public comment was closed before the motion. The committee’s action moves the ordinance forward to the full Board of Supervisors.