Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Six Month Budget Report topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Controller reports $63 million better-than-expected six-month picture; rainy-day deposits triggered

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee · February 12, 2014
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Controller Ben Rosenfield told the committee that six-month projections improve the general fund ending balance by about $62–63 million, driven by stronger property and hotel tax receipts and departmental savings; the report triggers rainy-day reserve deposits and reduces the Mayor's projected two-year deficit when split across years.

Controller Ben Rosenfield presented the Controller—s six-month status report, saying projected general fund available balance at year-end had improved to about $208 million, roughly $62–63 million higher than assumed in the Mayor—s budget instructions.

Rosenfield and Michelle Alersma (budget analysis) attributed most of the improvement to stronger property tax and hotel-tax receipts and to spending variances in departments such as Public Health and the Human Services Agency. The Controller—s office noted that voter-approved reserve rules require a portion of year-over-year revenue growth above 5% to be deposited into rainy-day reserves: 50% into an economic stabilization reserve and 25% into a one-time reserve. Rosenfield said the city is in a rainy-day deposit state for the first time in several years and explained how those reserve rules will limit the share of revenue available for ongoing operating needs.

The Mayor—s Budget Office (Melissa Whitehouse) described how the Controller—s update reduces the two-year projected deficit by about $31.3 million per year when the $63 million of improved balance is split across both budget years, lowering the FY14-15 deficit estimate to about $69.4 million (from earlier instruction figures). Committee members asked about uncertainties—open labor MOUs, transfer taxes and Affordable Care Act impacts—and Rosenfield highlighted several special-fund risks (Hetch Hetchy power/resale exposure, courthouse-construction fund shortfall). With presentations complete and no public comment, the committee moved to file the report.