Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committee Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee continues HOME SF amendments, advances rezoning and several referrals to full board
Summary
At its April 24 meeting the Land Use & Transportation Committee continued substantive HOME SF amendments for further review, voted to recommend a tourist-hotel rezoning to the full Board, and sent three additional items — the Environmental Justice framework, a Midtown Park LAFCO study, and a set of other committee reports — to the full board.
Get email alerts on the Committee Actions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Land Use & Transportation Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors met April 24 and took a mix of continuances and referrals on several agenda items.
Supervisors continued two related ordinances tied to HOME SF (Homeownership Means Equity) — one amending the Planning Code to exclude designated historic districts and a second adjusting HOME SF requirements and rent‑control disclosures — after Sponsor amendments were read into the record. Supervisor Aaron Peskin moved to amend item 2 with the circulated changes and then made a separate motion to continue items 1 and 2 together to the committee’s next meeting; the motion to continue passed 3–0.
The committee recommended an ordinance to rezone Assessor’s Parcel Block 0976 Lot 001 to permit up to 47 tourist‑hotel rooms and affirmed appropriate findings; Planning staff said the rezoning follows a settlement that includes payments to support a veterans permanent supportive‑housing program. The committee voted 3–0 to forward the rezoning to the full board with a positive recommendation.
Separately the committee sent several items to the full board as committee reports or recommendations: the proposed Environmental Justice Framework and related General Plan introduction (sent with a positive recommendation), and a LAFCO study and resident‑engagement request concerning Midtown Park Apartments (moved as a committee report). Where members requested more detail before action — most notably the MOHCD delegation item concerning ground‑lease amendments and residual‑receipts changes — the committee voted to continue so staff can supply additional information.
Votes were recorded verbally at the meeting; where roll‑call was conducted supervisors Peskin, Preston and Melgar voted aye on the items noted above. The committee adjourned after completing the agenda.
