Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Group Housing Sud topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances special-use district to prioritize family housing over new SROs in Chinatown and Tenderloin

San Francisco Board of Supervisors — Land Use and Transportation Committee · June 6, 2022
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supervisors advanced an ordinance to create a group housing special use district (SUD) for Chinatown and the Tenderloin to prioritize family-sized housing; community groups and residents strongly supported channeling development away from market-rate SROs toward family housing and requested equity reporting and affordability protections.

The Land Use & Transportation Committee on June 6 advanced an ordinance to create a group housing special-use district (SUD) in Chinatown and the Tenderloin intended to prioritize family-sized housing over new market-rate group housing (SRO-style developments). Committee members described the measure as a tool for “density equity” to direct housing growth toward permanent family units that serve existing low-income residents.

Supervisor Eric Peskin and other sponsors acknowledged that city attorney guidance does not view the SUD as a downzoning but said the SUD will target outcomes so upzoning benefits are distributed equitably across neighborhoods. Dozens of remote callers and representatives — including the Chinatown Community Development Center, Tenderloin Neighborhood Development Corporation, Tenderloin People’s Congress, Race & Equity in All Planning coalition and multiple tenants and SRO residents — provided testimony during the remote queue. Callers described overcrowded family use of SROs, children forced to study on beds, and urged that new group housing not further displace families; community planners asked for systematic reporting on who benefits from upzoning.

Supervisor Peskin moved to forward the ordinance to the full Board with a positive recommendation; the committee recorded Peskin, Preston and Melgar voting aye and advanced the item. Sponsors and many advocates asked that the ordinance be paired with other measures (fourplex/multiplex legislation) and recommended continued monitoring via equity reporting.