Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Department Positions Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors approve planning cuts as general‑fund savings and OK two‑year limited‑tenure hires
Summary
The Budget & Finance Committee voted to take the Planning Department's recommended reductions as general‑fund savings and approved allowing the department to create previously requested, unfunded positions as two‑year limited‑tenure roles, aiming to balance hiring flexibility with fiscal safeguards.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors Budget & Finance Committee voted June 24 to treat the Planning Department's recommended budget reductions as general‑fund savings rather than reductions to department fee revenue, and approved a policy requiring any newly authorized but unfunded planning positions to be limited‑tenure for two years.
John Ram, representing the Planning Department, told supervisors the department agreed with the budget analyst but requested authority to create a number of positions that would not be funded immediately so it could hire quickly if revenues materialize. Ram said the hiring process can take up to six months and argued that pre‑approval would allow the department to respond more promptly when supplemental funds are certified.
Budget analyst staff and Controller Ben Rosenfield cautioned that approving unfunded permanent positions is a policy choice. The analyst recommended that, if the Board authorized the positions, they be designated as limited‑tenure tied to the expected project term rather than permanent ongoing roles. The committee agreed: Chair Mark Farrell and supporting supervisors said a two‑year term would provide flexibility while avoiding the creation of indefinite permanent positions buried in future budgets.
Supervisor London Breed moved that the committee record the $359,000‑range recommended reductions for the Planning Department as general‑fund savings (transcript discussion referenced approximately $360,000 in fee‑revenue cuts). After discussion about whether the savings should flow back to the general fund or remain as fee‑revenue reductions, the committee held a roll‑call vote. Supervisors Eric Marr, John Avalos and (as recorded) the member listed as Reid voted in favor; Supervisors Scott Wiener and Mark Farrell voted no. The motion passed and the committee adopted the analyst's recommendation as general‑fund savings.
On the related policy matter, the committee accepted the analyst's recommendation that newly authorized positions be limited‑tenure, with the committee recording a two‑year term for those positions. The committee agreed the Board would scrutinize fee‑revenue assumptions and any future requests to appropriate funds for those positions.
What happens next: The committee's determinations will be reflected in items placed on the July 9 Board of Supervisors agenda and in the department's budget documents; if funds are later certified, appropriations would have to come before the Board for hiring authority to be funded.
