Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Landmark Designation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee recommends landmark designation for Golden Gate Valley Carnegie Library

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Land Use and Transportation Committee · February 28, 2022
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Land Use & Transportation Committee voted to recommend landmark designation for the Golden Gate Valley Carnegie Library (1801 Green St), citing its 1918 neoclassical design and role in the Carnegie library program; the measure will be forwarded to the full Board of Supervisors.

The Land Use and Transportation Committee on March 1 recommended that the Board of Supervisors designate the Golden Gate Valley Carnegie Library at 1801 Green Street as a San Francisco landmark.

Planning Department historic preservation staff told the committee the library, designed in the neoclassical style by Ernest Coxhead and opened in 1918, is the last of seven Carnegie branch libraries in the city not previously finalized for landmark status. Melanie Bishop of the Planning Department said the Historic Preservation Commission unanimously recommended designation based on the library’s association with civic and cultural history and its architectural significance.

A representative from Supervisor Stephanie’s office, Dominica Donovan, said the community has long sought formal recognition for the branch. Peter Warfield, executive director of the Library Users Association, told the committee, “This is one of the most beautiful libraries in San Francisco and it well deserves landmark designation,” while also urging careful wording around potential “replacement in kind” language in the ordinance.

Supervisor Aaron Peskin offered to be listed as a cosponsor. The committee voted unanimously to recommend the ordinance to the full Board of Supervisors.

The Board is scheduled to consider the item on its upcoming agenda; the committee record indicates items acted on today are expected to appear on the Board agenda of March 8 unless otherwise stated.