Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pier27 Phase2 Financing topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee forwards $34.7M appropriation and $25.3M bond authorization for Pier 27 Phase 2 and Northern Waterfront repairs

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee · May 29, 2013
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Port staff asked the committee to forward a $34.7 million appropriation and authorization to issue up to $25.3 million in port revenue bonds to complete Phase 2 of the Pier 27 cruise terminal and repair historic northern waterfront piers; the budget analyst found the requests reasonable and estimated annual debt service at about $1.46 million.

Port staff presented Items 5 and 6, asking the committee to forward a financing package to support Phase 2 of the James R. Herman Cruise Terminal at Pier 27 and Northern Waterfront historic pier repairs.

Elaine Forbes said the Port completed Phase 1 and seeks financing to complete maritime improvements, park and plaza elements and operational components needed for regular cruise terminal use. The Port requested authority to issue up to $25,300,000 in port revenue bonds and an appropriation ordinance of approximately $34,700,000, of which Forbes said $25,300,000 would be new revenue bond funds and $9,400,000 would be reallocated from previously authorized taxable debt. Forbes described a mix of sources for the total project—58% port sources, 16% passenger facility charges, 15% from a parks bond, 5% city contribution and 6% FEMA funding—and reported the total project cost estimate at roughly $112,000,000 plus a $2,000,000 contingency.

Budget analyst Mr. Rose said his office examined the $34.7M request and found the expenditures reasonable, noting estimated annual debt service of about $1,460,000 and term principal and interest estimates over 30 years (figures reported in the analyst’s table). The committee voted without objection to forward Items 5 and 6 to the full Board for consideration so the Port could maintain its construction schedule.