Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Supervisor Walton, committee move to remove Dogpatch life-sciences overlay

Land Use and Transportation Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors · October 18, 2021
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Land Use & Transportation Committee voted to send an ordinance to the full Board that would eliminate the Life Sciences and Medical Special Use District overlay in the Dogpatch, a change sponsors say will protect neighborhood production, distribution and repair (PDR) uses; a developer requested grandfathering for projects that relied on the prior zoning.

The Land Use and Transportation Committee voted to forward to the full Board of Supervisors an ordinance to remove the Life Sciences and Medical Special Use District overlay in the Dogpatch neighborhood.

President Shimon Walton, sponsor of the item, told the committee the overlay "does not serve the Dogpatch neighborhood" and argued it has allowed biomedical startups to lease spaces that historically housed car repair, artists, fishmongers and other PDR uses "and once affordable PDR spaces ... drive up rents." Walton said planning staff support the change as aligned with the Eastern Neighborhoods plan and PDR-protection policies.

In public comment, Daniel Sachs of DeCA Companies asked the committee to preserve grandfathering protections for projects that made economic decisions under the existing Industrial Protection Zone (IPZ) and said applicants had relied on that zoning. Chair Mirna Melgar asked Walton to confirm that any IPZ changes would be addressed in trailing legislation; Walton said they would.

The committee recorded three ayes and sent the ordinance to the Board with a positive recommendation.

The committee’s action is a committee recommendation only; final policy and any grandfathering details would be decided by the full Board.