Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Hate Violence Aapi topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Human Rights Commission presents landscape analysis on anti-AAPI violence; committee schedules follow-up
Summary
Human Rights Commission staff presented findings that city-funded violence-prevention and victim-support programs lack consistent reporting, language access gaps hinder survivors, and referrals do not guarantee services; the committee continued the item for departmental follow-up and further hearings.
At a Sept. 23 hearing, the Human Rights Commission (HRC) and the Office of Racial Equity presented a citywide landscape analysis of responses to hate violence and crime impacting Asian American and Pacific Islander communities. The presentation, prompted by a May Board resolution, identified gaps in program coordination, reporting, language access and accountability and proposed a set of recommendations for a citywide response.
Sarah Sang (Policy Director, Office of Racial Equity) said HRC's work compiled departmental program inventories, conducted interviews, held community workshops and convened a summit. Sang said reported hate incidents undercount lived experience: "Stop AAPI Hate received over 350 reports of hate violence against AAPI folks in the city in just 2020, and that included 71 reports of physical assault," she said, and she noted FBI and police statistics that show racial-bias incidents have increased.
Britney Chakwada (HRC chief of staff) highlighted three overarching findings: gaps in services and accountability, a lack of public visibility about available supports, and inconsistent reporting and definitions across departments. She outlined six priority recommendations: standardized reporting and shared definitions; improved language access; a citywide response protocol and wraparound services; strengthened civil-rights enforcement; community partnerships including restorative or transformative justice pathways; and increased investment in social-justice and cross-cultural programming.
Committee members thanked HRC for the draft report and asked for department-specific follow-up. Several supervisors requested that other departments, including law enforcement and the District Attorney's Office, be included in subsequent briefings and that the final HRC report identify implementation responsibilities and resource needs. HRC said it had circulated a draft for public comment and aimed to finalize the report by year-end; the committee voted 3-0 to continue the item to the call of the Chair to allow further departmental engagement and follow-up (Stephanie: aye; Haney: aye; Marr: aye).
Next steps: HRC will accept public comment on the draft, finalize the report (target: end of year), and the committee will hold a follow-up hearing including other departments to track implementation and funding of recommended actions.
