Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Surveillance Technology topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee forwards Elections surveillance-technology policy to full Board after presentation

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee · October 2, 2023
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Rules Committee unanimously recommended an ordinance approving a surveillance-technology policy for the Department of Elections to acquire a social-media dashboard; Elections Director John Arntz said the tool is meant to consolidate social accounts and measure engagement, not to track individuals.

The Rules Committee advanced an ordinance on Oct. 2 that would approve a surveillance-technology policy allowing the Department of Elections to acquire a social-media monitoring dashboard.

Director John Arntz told the committee the department seeks a dashboard to display posts from platforms such as X (Twitter), Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram on a single screen, link social activity to the department’s outreach calendar and improve scheduling and staffing efficiency. Arntz said the department is not selecting a vendor at this hearing; staff tested a trial of Sprout (and listed Hootsuite as an example) but emphasized the stated intent is to track aggregate engagement metrics (hits, responses, number of questions) rather than to collect identifying information about individual users.

Committee members asked about procurement history and product choice; Arntz said the procurement process began in 2022. Telephone public comment from David Pilpel expressed support, calling the request a reasonable use of technology rather than mass surveillance. The committee voted unanimously to send the ordinance to the full Board with a positive recommendation.

The ordinance has proceeded through the city’s surveillance-technology review process and will next appear on the Board calendar for further consideration.