Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Gvro topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee advances ordinance requiring officers to file Gun Violence Restraining Orders within three days

Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee · March 25, 2021
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee voted to recommend an ordinance to require peace officers to serve and file temporary Gun Violence Restraining Orders within three days and to recognize out‑of‑state GVROs; SFPD described training and recent case examples and public commenters from Brady United supported the measure.

Vice Chair Katherine Stephany brought forward an ordinance on March 25 to expand San Francisco’s Gun Violence Restraining Order (GVRO) program and align local code with recent state changes. The ordinance requires peace officers to serve and file temporary GVROs with the court no later than three days after issuance and allows the city to treat qualifying out‑of‑state GVROs as if issued locally.

Stefani said the changes are intended to strengthen a civil tool that can prevent individuals at imminent risk from accessing firearms. “We need to use every tool we possibly can to combat gun violence,” she said, describing GVROs as a prevention measure that can be used when family members or law enforcement identify credible threats.

Commander Raj Viswani of the San Francisco Police Department’s investigations division explained how the department implements the GVRO process, citing training materials, coordination with the city attorney’s office and examples where GVROs and subsequent search warrants led to firearm seizures. Sergeant Patrick Fay described a case in which officers identified a firearm nexus after repeated neighbor complaints and obtained a GVRO followed by a search warrant and seizure.

Public commenters from Brady United Against Gun Violence voiced support for the ordinance and thanked SFPD staff. The committee approved a small, non‑substantive amendment to add language requiring coordination with the City Attorney’s Office and then voted to recommend the ordinance, as amended, to the full Board of Supervisors.

The ordinance advances to the Board of Supervisors with a positive committee recommendation.