Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Airport Concessions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee approves new Terminal 3 newsstand lease, budget analyst cites lower MAG than existing tenant
Summary
The Budget and Finance Committee recommended approval of a competitive seven-year lease for a new Terminal 3 newsstand; staff said the selected proposer offers a minimum annual guarantee lower than an existing comparable tenant but that the RFP process weights local participation and other qualifications.
Get email alerts on the Airport Concessions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Budget and Finance Committee recommended approval of a seven-year lease for a new newsstand in Terminal 3, after airport staff and the city budget analyst described a competitive RFP process and projected rent.
Kathy Weidner of San Francisco Airport said Paradis SFO LLC was selected as the highest-ranked responsive proposer for a roughly 1,062-square-foot retail space in Terminal 3 after seven firms responded to the RFP. The proposed lease uses the airport's standard concession structure (percentage rent with a minimum annual guarantee).
Weidner described the proposed minimum annual guarantee (MAG) at about $401,000, noting the airport now uses RFP scoring that balances MAG with other factors โ including local participation โ to broaden access for local Bay Area businesses. The Budget Analyst noted an existing similar newsstand in Terminal 3 carries a higher MAG (about $577,000) and estimated Paradis's minimum payments would total about $2.8 million over the seven-year term.
Supervisor John Avalos asked how many respondents are locally owned firms vs. national brands; Weidner said national brands often include a local subcontractor component and that the airport's RFP scoring emphasizes Bay Area ownership (the Terminal 2 sample showed roughly 70% local ownership by the airport's county-based definition). Weidner offered to provide further county-by-county breakout including San Francisco and San Mateo County specifically.
There was no public comment on the item and the committee moved the lease forward with a recommendation to the full Board.
