Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Liquor License Transfers topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee recommends approval of several off-sale liquor-license transfers

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Public Safety and Neighborhood Services Committee · November 8, 2019
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee heard ALU reports and applicant statements and moved several premise-to-premise liquor-license transfers (Type 20/21) to the full Board with positive recommendations after conditioning hours and loitering prevention measures.

The committee considered multiple premise-to-premise transfers of off-sale liquor licenses on Nov. 8 and forwarded them to the full Board of Supervisors with positive recommendations after ALU reports and applicant statements.

For Senia Trading (1262 Stockton, item 3), Officer Solomons said ALU found zero letters of protest or support, Central Station had no opposition, and recommended approval with conditions (sales allowed 8 a.m.–10 p.m.; active monitoring of adjacent property and loitering prevention). An applicant representative, Raymond, told the committee the business operates as a grocery store and said "it—s very important for our business to prosper by having this alcohol license" to provide customers with a broader range of goods.

For Queens SF LLC (1235 Ninth Avenue, item 4), ALU again reported no letters of protest or support and recommended approval with conditions (hours 8 a.m.–9 p.m.; monitoring obligations). Applicant Edo Kim described plans to sell traditional Korean rice wine and said the business hopes to "educate the community on traditional Korean rice wine." Representatives from Supervisor Haney—s office requested a continuance for the Target transfer (1690 Folsom) to ensure completed community outreach; subsequent materials and testimony indicated the office and ALU expected approval and the committee directed the clerk to prepare resolutions finding transfers met public convenience and necessity and forwarded them to the Board with positive recommendations.

The committee took no public testimony opposed to the transfers and moved each item forward without objection.