Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Delivery Fee Cap topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rules Committee preserves 15% delivery cap for core service, allows add‑ons by agreement

Rules Committee, San Francisco Board of Supervisors · July 11, 2022

Summary

The committee approved sending to the full Board an amendment that preserves the 15% cap for a defined "core delivery service" while allowing restaurants to voluntarily purchase additional optional services beyond that cap; supervisors Chan and Mandelmann joined as co‑sponsors.

The Rules Committee on July 11 voted unanimously to send to the full Board an ordinance amendment that preserves the city’s 15% cap for a defined "core delivery service" while permitting restaurants, of their own volition, to contract for supplemental services that may exceed the cap.

Chair Aaron Peskin described negotiations between the Golden Gate Restaurant Association, the Board and third‑party delivery platforms as producing a version that keeps the 15% cap for the core delivery service — which the ordinance defines as an online service that lists and makes a covered establishment discoverable and that facilitates or performs delivery — but allows restaurants to opt into additional services such as optimization placement, credit‑card processing or marketing for separate fees.

The Chair said the draft resolves outstanding litigation (a stipulation that would lead to dismissal of remaining claims by DoorDash and Grubhub) and benefits struggling restaurants by guaranteeing a baseline, capped core service. Supervisors Connie Chan and Rafael Mandelmann asked to be added as co‑sponsors; the committee voted to forward the item to the full Board with a positive recommendation.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source