Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pension Forfeiture topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rules Committee continues charter amendment on pension forfeiture after labor meet‑and‑confer remains open

Rules Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors · July 18, 2022
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Committee discussed a second‑draft charter amendment to allow forfeiture of city-funded pension benefits after an administrative hearing for certain crimes; Chair Peskin said meet‑and‑confer with unions is ongoing and the item was continued to the call of the chair.

The Rules Committee reviewed a second draft of a proposed charter amendment that would allow the forfeiture of city‑funded pension benefits for a member of the San Francisco Employee Retirement System upon a finding by clear and convincing evidence, after an administrative hearing, that the member committed bribery, embezzlement, extortion, willful fraud in connection with official duties or perjury to conceal such crimes.

Chair Aaron Peskin said the measure is aimed at future wrongdoing and does not target past misconduct; he described seven meet‑and‑confer sessions with labor and thanked Department of Human Resources staff for engagement. Artis Graham, representing DHR, told the committee DHR will continue meet‑and‑confer in good faith and offered a closed‑session blow‑by‑blow if desired. Several public callers urged stronger accountability and some urged retroactivity; Chair Peskin and staff advised retroactive forfeiture was legally vulnerable because pension rights are vested and that retroactive application was not permissible under counsel.

Given outstanding labor negotiations and legal questions, the committee voted to amend a scheduling detail (moving a referenced election date) and to continue the item to the call of the chair so negotiations and technical cleanup can continue before the measure would be transmitted for ballot consideration.

The committee did not place the measure on the November 2022 ballot and noted further meet‑and‑confer is required before any final determination about timing.