Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Community Development Committee topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee forwards two Citizens Committee on Community Development reappointments to full Board

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee · March 14, 2022

Summary

The Rules Committee recommended reappointment of Azalea (Veil) Renfield and Glenn Loughman to the Citizens Committee on Community Development for terms ending Feb. 23, 2023, following brief applicant remarks and support from the Mayor’s Office of Community Development.

The Rules Committee on March 14 voted to forward two reappointments to the Citizens Committee on Community Development with positive recommendations to the full Board of Supervisors.

Clerk Victor Young read item 4, which covers two appointments to terms ending Feb. 23, 2023. Applicants Azalea (Veil) Renfield (seat 1) and Glenn Loughman (seat 2) each spoke briefly about their service on the committee and the ongoing work on HUD funding recommendations.

Veil Renfield said she has served on the committee since 2018 and expressed appreciation for the work ahead. “It’s been such an honor to serve on this committee since 2018,” Renfield said. Glenn Loughman similarly renewed his commitment to community and economic development amid the challenges of the pandemic.

Brian Chu of the Mayor’s Office of Community Development told the committee the applicants have been committed members and recommended their reappointment. The committee recorded unanimous ‘Aye’ votes from Walton, Mandelman and Peskin and forwarded both names to the full Board with positive recommendations.

No public commenters spoke on this item by the time the clerk closed public comment, and the committee adjourned shortly after completing the vote.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source