Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
MTA seeks window‑wrap advertising to help close $22M shortfall; supervisors question revenue guarantees
Summary
The Municipal Transportation Agency asked the subcommittee to allow Titan Outdoor to wrap a portion of Muni vehicle windows for incremental ad revenue; MTA projects $500,000 annually but Titan declined to add any portion to the contract's minimum annual guarantee, prompting supervisory concern and a committee referral to the full Board without recommendation.
The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency told the Budget & Finance subcommittee it is seeking authority to allow limited advertising window wraps on buses and light rail vehicles to generate incremental revenue as the agency grapples with a projected $22 million operating deficit.
Sonali Bose of the MTA said the item is an MTA request to address the FY2011–12 budget gap and that the agency estimates up to $500,000 in incremental revenue from allowing Titan Outdoor to wrap windows on up to 5% of buses and 10% of LRVs. Under the existing contract structure Titan pays the MTA 65% of incremental revenue after the minimum annual guarantee (MAG) is met.
Budget analyst Harvey Rose and several supervisors questioned why Titan would refuse to place any portion of the expected incremental revenue into the MAG, leaving no guaranteed payment to the MTA. Rose warned that without a guarantee the city could receive little or no net revenue from the change.
Supervisor Kim said she was "not thrilled" by the amendment but was willing to move the item forward with the understanding the MTA would review performance and could exit the program during annual reviews. Bose confirmed the amendment includes annual review and the MTA board can discontinue wraps if revenues or public feedback do not justify continuation.
Analysts noted Titan exceeded the MAG in the first two years of the contract but maintained the company declined to revise the MAG given market uncertainty. The committee sent the item to the full Board of Supervisors without recommendation.
The MTA characterized the amendment as a stopgap to help avoid service cuts or fare increases; supervisors urged stronger negotiation in future contracts to secure more predictable revenue outcomes for the city.
