Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors Hear Wide-Ranging Views on Parking, From Calls for More Garages to Dynamic Pricing
Summary
A full-day hearing on parking policy drew MTA, Transportation Authority and Planning Department briefings and hours of public comment. Officials discussed 320,000 on-street spaces, trade-offs of a citywide 1:1 parking requirement, and management tools such as dynamic pricing, parking benefit districts and shared parking.
San Francisco’s Government Audit and Oversight Committee held a lengthy public hearing on parking policy that brought city agency briefings and a steady stream of residents, merchants and advocates urging sharply different responses.
MTA and Department of Parking and Traffic staff told the committee the city has roughly 320,000 on-street parking spaces and about 23,000 parking meters; meter net revenues totalled about $29.7 million, the MTA presenter said. The Transportation Authority’s field studies in four neighborhoods found block-level occupancy above 85% in some commercial corridors and uneven turnover patterns that contribute to perceived shortages. "We have about 320,000 parking spaces available on street," the MTA presenter reported.
Tilly Chang of the Transportation Authority summarized neighborhood case studies and management options, including stricter time limits, shared use of underutilized off-street lots, and new payment technology to enable variable pricing. "In many cases there is inefficient utilization in terms of the match between demand and the supply designated by the time limits," she said, pointing to evidence that many shoppers arrive via transit or on foot while longer-term spaces are occupied by employees.
Anne Marie Rogers of the Planning Department warned against a blanket 1-to-1 residential parking requirement. She said the city’s current controls vary by neighborhood—downtown caps, adjacent neighborhoods 1:4, and a 1:1 rule in much of the remainder—and that imposing 1:1 citywide would raise construction costs and reduce housing supply. Rogers estimated a parking space can add roughly $20,000–$50,000 to the cost of a housing unit and said requiring garages broadly could eliminate retail frontage and public on-street spaces.
Elected officials and budget staff pressed the MTA for a clearer accounting of the Off-Street Parking Revenue Fund. The budget analyst’s office reported a $7.7 million net deficit over six years at the fund level and recommended facility-level financial audits to improve oversight. The MTA agreed to provide detailed financial profiles as requested.
Public speakers included neighborhood merchants who urged more local garages and better downtown/residential differentiation, and transit and environmental advocates who urged smarter management instead of new garage construction. Suggestions ranged from targeted diagonal parking and extended meter hours in high-turnover corridors to creating parking benefit districts that direct some meter revenue back to neighborhood improvements.
The committee did not adopt immediate policy changes. Chair Sean Ellsburn asked agencies to provide the requested financial detail and continued the item to the call of the chair for follow-up work and potential legislative proposals.
