Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Central Soma Plan topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Central SoMa amendments move forward after planning commission recommendations and public debate over displacement and Old Mint funding

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Land Use & Transportation Committee · October 1, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supervisor Kim introduced technical amendments to the Central SoMa plan and the Planning Commission presented several recommendations (PDR rules, POPOS design, green walls, and key-site exceptions). The committee accepted today's amendments, continued several substantive issues to Oct. 15, and heard strong public comment demanding deeper anti‑displacement measures and restored funding for the Old Mint.

The Land Use & Transportation Committee heard a detailed report from Planning Department staff and the Planning Commission on proposed Central South Of Market (Central SoMa) plan amendments. Lisa Chen of the Planning Department summarized Commission recommendations: limited conditional use for hotels where projects were already in the pipeline, tailored PDR (production, distribution and repair) floor-to-floor and transparency requirements, site-specific exceptions for several key sites (Flower Mart, Creamery, Park Block), adjustments to POPOS design and review to prioritize youth and family needs, and exploratory measures such as living walls and legalization pathways for live-work lofts to fund community stabilization.

Planning staff and the Commission also discussed public-benefits allocations and recommended restoring the Old Mint funding line from $15 million back to $20 million, with corresponding adjustments elsewhere in the benefits package. Committee members noted that some of the public-benefits and CFD (community facilities district) funding allocations may be addressed in the Government Audit & Oversight committee and that final public-benefits language remains under negotiation.

Public comment was extensive and split: community advocates and neighborhood organizations pressed for stronger anti-displacement protections (including land-banking, stricter POPOS standards, limits on micro-units and market-rate SRO conversions) and for $20 million or more to restore the Old Mint. Builders, labor and some local residents supported the plan's housing and jobs targets and highlighted workforce opportunities. Supervisor Kim introduced a slate of primarily technical amendments for Oct. 1 and said she will present more substantive amendments on Oct. 15; the committee accepted today's technical amendments and continued the remaining Central SoMa items to Oct. 15.

Committee members asked staff to clarify which Planning Commission recommendations are incorporated into today's substitute legislation and which require additional language or separate GAO review; the committee agreed to continue the matter to allow more time to refine public-benefits, POPOS design standards and CFD language.