Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Sfmta Appeals Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee weighs appeals ordinance to expand limited Board review of SFMTA decisions; item continued for one week
Summary
Supervisors Safaie and Peskin proposed an ordinance to allow limited Board review of certain SFMTA decisions (stop signs, preferential parking, curb uses and other district‑level curb management decisions). SFMTA staff outlined process improvements and urged narrow exemptions for transit and Vision Zero projects; the committee amended several provisions and continued the item for one week to refine timing and exemptions.
The Land Use Committee considered an ordinance intended to restore a limited check on San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) actions by permitting the Board of Supervisors to review certain final SFMTA decisions—on items such as stop signs, parking changes, preferential parking programs and curb uses—when a threshold of supervisors requests review.
Supervisors Safaie and Peskin framed the measure as a scaled, negotiated compromise to give elected representatives recourse on neighborhood‑level decisions that have real impacts for constituents. SFMTA Director (transcript: Director Ruskin) and Tom McGuire, Director of the Sustainable Streets Division, described internal process improvements (a community response team, district capital allocations, improved 311 handling and plain‑language outreach) and cautioned that broad review could slow delivery of transit‑priority and Vision Zero projects. Multiple transportation and safety advocates (Walk SF, San Francisco Transit Riders, San Francisco Bicycle Coalition, SPUR) urged stronger exemptions for transit and Vision Zero projects and recommended increasing the supervisor threshold for an appeal to five (aligning with conditional‑use rules) to avoid excessive appeals.
Committee members agreed to several amendments on the record: remove a public‑petition threshold, strike a $600 filing fee, add an exemption carving out development‑project loading zones and refine bicycle‑lane language; supervisors and the clerk noted timing windows must conform to the charter’s 60‑day limit for Board action. After debate the committee continued the ordinance for one week to allow staff and the City Attorney to finalize timing language and conforming edits; the item will return with the agreed amendments.
