Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Surface Mounted Facilities topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee Continues Debate Over Surface-Mounted Telecom Boxes; Residents Say Faster Internet Worth Small Visual Trade-offs

San Francisco Board of Supervisors, Public Safety & Neighborhood Services Committee · June 12, 2017
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee continued an ordinance that would modify site-permit exceptions for surface-mounted telecommunications facilities to June 28 after brief public comment from Richmond-District residents who said the boxes are unobtrusive and would support faster fiber internet.

The Public Safety & Neighborhood Services Committee on June 12 continued consideration of an ordinance amending the Public Works Code to modify exceptions to the surface-mounted facility site-permit requirements, saying staff should return with more refined materials on June 28.

Supervisor Malia Cohen, sitting in for Supervisor Sheehy, moved to continue the item so the administration could finalize details. The chair called the motion and it passed without objection after a short procedural exchange to reopen public comment.

Three members of the public from the Richmond District spoke on aesthetics and neighborhood impact. Paul Slade, an artist and long-time Richmond resident, said the army‑green boxes appeared unobtrusive and compared them to "a toolbox for modern technology," while asking that the city ensure reasonable maintenance to prevent graffiti. Catherine Jore, a renter, said high-speed internet is "vital" for residents and supported the legislation as a necessary step to build a better fiber network. Teddy Solomon, another Richmond resident, said the boxes' appearance is a small price to pay for improved internet service that benefits livelihoods and local businesses.

The committee recessed and will take up the item again on June 28, when members expect more detailed materials from staff to assess permit exceptions and implementation details.