Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Health Advisory topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rules Committee recommends seven appointees to Sugary Drink Distributor Tax advisory body after large applicant pool

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee · March 8, 2021
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After hearing statements from 10+ public-health and community applicants and multiple public endorsements, the Rules Committee recommended seven candidates to the full Board for the Sugary Drink Distributor Tax Advisory Committee; Chair Peskin said the field was 'remarkably impressive.'

The Rules Committee on March 9 held a lengthy hearing for Item 5 to fill seven seats on the Sugary Drink Distributor Tax Advisory Committee and voted to forward a recommended slate to the full Board.

Chair Aaron Peskin described the candidate pool as "a remarkably impressive group of applicants" and asked each nominee to limit remarks. Applicants included public-health professionals and community organizers who cited experience with health equity, food access and community programs. Diana Cabanero (appearing as Diana Kevinaro in the record) described her lived experience as a parent and public-health work, saying she wanted to bring both personal and professional experience to the committee. Marna Armstead, executive director of SisterWeb, described community-based doula services and partnership work focused on nutrition and perinatal supports.

Public comment included endorsements from former and current advisory committee members, public-health researchers and YMCA leaders. Doctor Jonathan Butler, a current or former committee member, called in to support Vanessa Baum for seat 1. Union and nonprofit representatives urged appointments they said would ensure continuity, health equity and strong community representation.

After questioning and discussion about nominee seats with specific eligibility (for example, seats reserved for nominees from the school district’s parent advisory council and for medical-institution-employed experts), the Committee voted to forward a recommended slate of seven names to the full Board of Supervisors. The committee’s vote to forward recommendations was recorded as aye by members present, with Supervisor Rafael Mandelman excused from these items at committee.

The Rules Committee’s recommended slate will go to the full Board for confirmation. The hearing record shows extensive public-health and community experience among the nominees; the final confirmation vote will be held at the Board of Supervisors.