Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rules Committee advances Good Food Purchasing ordinance after presentations and public pressure to raise hospital targets
Summary
After a multi‑year process and baseline assessments, the committee approved amendments and recommended a Good Food Purchasing Program ordinance for hospitals and jails to the full Board; public commenters praised the plan but many urged higher, faster reductions in animal‑product purchasing.
The Rules Committee voted to send to the full Board a proposed ordinance adopting Good Food Purchasing Program (GFPP) standards and department goals for food procurement by the Department of Public Health (DPH) and the Sheriff's Department for hospitals and jails.
Supervisor Susan Feuer introduced the item and said it follows nearly three years of stakeholder engagement. Colleen McKinney of the Center for Good Food Purchasing presented a baseline assessment that analyzed about $7.5 million in food purchases across Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, Laguna Honda Hospital and the Sheriff's Department. The baseline showed roughly 7% sourced locally, about 5% from producers with strong labor practices, and under 2% in categories identified as environmentally sustainable or high animal welfare. McKinney said 56% of purchases were whole or minimally processed foods and the assessment would guide phased goal setting.
Representatives from the Sheriff's Office and hospitals described implementation challenges. Lieutenant John Caramucci said the Sheriff’s Office completed baseline work with its vendor and plans to pursue goals. Hospital staff said vendor certification alignment and cost are hurdles: a hospital chef said moving to no‑antibiotics‑ever (NAE) products can increase some costs by 50–60%, while other shifts (e.g., local produce) have been implemented successfully.
Public comment was lengthy and overwhelmingly supportive of adopting GFPP standards, but many speakers urged the Department of Public Health to match the Sheriff's Department’s more aggressive target to replace 50% of animal products with plant‑based alternatives. Medical professionals, climate and labor advocates, and unions supported the ordinance; animal‑welfare and public‑health activists pressed for stronger, faster reductions in animal products and tougher "valued workforce" requirements.
Supervisor Feuer proposed clarifying, non‑substantive amendments (definitions and wording tweaks); the committee passed the amendments and then voted to recommend the ordinance to the full Board as amended. The record shows unanimous committee votes in favor among the members present.
Next steps: the ordinance, as amended, will go to the full Board of Supervisors for consideration, including any further technical or fiscal analyses and possible revisions.
