Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sprinkler Requirement topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sprinkler proposal for nonresidential areas of residential hotels continued for two weeks to address commercial-space impacts

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Land Use Committee · October 30, 2017
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Sponsor described a modest, sale-triggered requirement for sprinklers in nonresidential areas of residential hotels after 08/01/2017; tenant advocates urged adoption, but the committee continued the item for two weeks so staff can draft narrow amendments to protect affordable commercial spaces from unintended lease pass-throughs.

Item 4 would amend the fire and housing codes to require automatic sprinklers in nonresidential areas of residential hotels sold or transferred after 08/01/2017, and to forward the ordinance to the California Building Standards Commission. Sponsor Supervisor Aaron Peskin said many fires have begun in commercial areas and basements — as in the 801 Pacific Avenue fire — and described the proposal as a "modest step" that is triggered upon transfer or sale rather than being mandatory for all buildings.

Peskin thanked community organizations (including the Chinatown Community Development Center), tenants displaced in the 801 Pacific fire, the SRO Task Force, the Fire Department and DBI for support, and said staff and the Deputy City Attorney were working on narrow tweaks to address concerns that sprinkler requirements could pass through costs to tenants or threaten affordable commercial spaces under certain lease structures. He proposed a two-week continuance to draft those amendments.

Tenant speakers and advocates — including Avis (Mission SRO Collaborative alumnus), Yang Ying (speaking for low-income families), Loheng Wing Ho of the Community Tenants Association, an 88-year-old survivor of the 801 Pacific fire (Fongsuo Nu), and other senior tenants — testified strongly in favor of the sprinkler requirement, stressing senior mobility and vulnerability and the need to prevent displacement caused by fires. After public comment, the committee approved a motion to continue the item for two weeks to allow staff to prepare the narrow amendments; the motion was taken without objection.

The committee did not adopt the ordinance at this hearing; it was continued to allow policy language to be refined to limit unintended impacts on affordable commercial tenants while preserving life-safety aims.