Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Safety topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rules Committee adopts cleanup and five-month extension for street-level drug distribution task force report

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee · September 14, 2020
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Rules Committee adopted non-substantive edits and a five-month extension to the reporting deadline for the Street Level Drug Distribution Task Force, moving the ordinance forward to the full Board with a positive recommendation. No members of the public spoke on the item.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee on Sept. 14 adopted a non-substantive cleanup and a five-month extension to the deadline for the Street Level Drug Distribution Task Force to file its initial report, then recommended the ordinance to the full Board.

Clerk Victor Young read the ordinance, which extends the reporting deadline to Aug. 31, 2020, and requires subsequent reports every three months to include a summary of the task force’s progress and plans for the next period. Abigail River Monte Mesa, speaking on behalf of Supervisor Haney, told the committee the extension would give the task force time to regroup after months of interrupted meetings due to the COVID-19 pandemic and requested a cleanup correction to the task force’s name to reflect its current designation as the Street Level Drug Distribution Task Force.

Chair Supervisor Hilary Ronan opened public comment; the clerk reported there were no callers. Ronan moved to incorporate the amendments and, after a unanimous roll-call vote (Supervisors Stephanie and Marr and Chair Ronan voting aye), the committee adopted the amendment and then voted to send the amended ordinance forward with a positive recommendation.

The committee’s action was procedural: the measure was amended for clarity and schedule and advanced to the full Board of Supervisors for further consideration.