Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Park Merced topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee amends Park Merced street‑vacation resolution, sets Board committee hearing date

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Land Use and Transportation Committee · August 1, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

DPW presented street‑vacation requests tied to Park Merced subphases 1a/1b; the committee amended the resolution to list a Board committee hearing on September 6 and forwarded Item 4 as a committee report while moving Item 5 out of committee without recommendation and to the September 6 meeting.

Paul Mabry of the Department of Public Works presented two related items concerning the Park Merced multi‑phase development: a resolution declaring intent to conditionally vacate portions of streets within subphases 1a and 1b and an ordinance ordering the conditional vacation of those portions.

Mabry said the vacation requests are tied to subdivision applications and the project's development agreement; the tentative maps include conditions of approval and City Planning approval was recorded in the file (the presenter stated "August the 24th of 2015" in the record). He said the project sponsor requested certain streets be vacated and that map submittals show areas to be vacated with replacement dedications planned.

Chair Cohen proposed and the committee adopted an amendment to Item 4 to add the date the Board will sit as a committee of the whole to hear the street vacation (listed in the record as "September 6 at 03:00"). Supervisors moved to forward Item 4, as amended, with a committee‑report recommendation and to move Item 5 to the Board without recommendation for the September 6 meeting; both motions passed without objection and were recorded as unanimous.

Per the presenters, final maps will not be recorded until Planning's tentative‑map conditions are met; DPW confirmed it supports including those conditions on the final maps as part of the approvals process.