Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Castro topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee adopts amendments and forwards interim Castro zoning controls to Board

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Land Use and Transportation Committee · August 1, 2016
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee adopted Supervisor Scott Wiener’s amendments and forwarded an 18‑month interim zoning resolution imposing conditional‑use review for pharmacy and medical service uses in the Castro Neighborhood Commercial District to the full Board.

Supervisor Scott Wiener introduced an 18‑month interim zoning resolution to require conditional‑use authorization from the Planning Commission for pharmacy and medical‑service uses within the Castro Neighborhood Commercial District. Wiener said the requirement is "fair and consistent" with neighborhood commercial districts where similar conditional‑use rules already apply, and that an over‑concentration of pharmacies and medical services can jeopardize neighborhood‑serving retail.

"Within 1 block of the intersection of 18 and Castro…there are, approximately 3 existing pharmacies and 2 medical service uses," Wiener said, emphasizing the need to preserve a mix of retail and unique neighborhood businesses. Wiener distributed amendments he said would better document the legislative intent and recommended adopting those amendments and forwarding the item as a committee report for Board consideration.

A public commenter supported the interim controls, arguing conditional‑use review helps ensure community voice. Supervisor Aaron Peskin moved the additional‑finding amendments and to forward the item; Chair Malia Cohen said the motion passed without objection "as amended." The committee therefore forwarded the interim controls and accompanying amendments to the full Board for further consideration.

The resolution cites planning code requirements (Planning Code section 303, per the record) and is intended to give the City time to study and design a permanent solution to the concentration issue.