Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Governance And Administration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Budget committee reviews proposed work plan for new Budget & Legislative Analyst contract; consultants to refine hours and return

Budget and Finance Committee, Board of Supervisors · December 9, 2009
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee heard presentations from the consultant team selected to provide the Board—s Budget & Legislative Analyst services beginning January 2010, discussed a proposed hours allocation and new policy-analysis responsibilities, and continued the item so the team can consult individual supervisors and return with a final work plan.

The Board—s incoming Budget & Legislative Analyst contractor (Harvey M. Rose Associates with Deborah A. Newman and Louie & Wong joint venture) presented a proposed scope of services and recommended 2010 hours allocation to the Budget & Finance Committee.

Scope and hours: The proposed scope included four main areas: budget analysis (recommended 3,000 hours), legislative analysis (8,400 hours), a new policy-analysis area (1,600 hours) and performance audits (3,900 hours). The team described plans to change report templates to include policy implications alongside fiscal impacts and proposed establishing a formal annual work plan and performance evaluation procedure with the Board.

Supervisors' requests: Members asked for clearer report templates showing options and effects of different policy choices, inclusion of prior controller reports and audits where relevant, and mechanisms for assigning a liaison from the Board (GAO chair, Budget & Finance chair or president) to manage work-plan shifts during the year. Supervisors also discussed a bank of hours each member could draw on for individual requests.

Decision: The committee left the hearing open and asked the consultant team to meet individually with supervisors, then return in January with refined scope and hours allocation; the clerk noted the committee could adopt the work plan by motion thereafter.