Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Campaign Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rules Committee continues ordinance requiring candidate attestations to chair

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee · June 13, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its June 13, 2018 meeting the San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee heard a description of an ordinance to amend the Campaign and Government Conduct Code requiring candidates to attest they did not coordinate with other committees, and Chair Supervisor Asha Safai moved to continue the item to the call of the chair; the motion carried without objection.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee on June 13, 2018 continued consideration of an ordinance that would amend the Campaign and Government Conduct Code to require candidates to attest that they had not coordinated with other committees.

Clerk Victor Young read the item into the record, describing it as "an ordinance ... to require candidates to attest to lack of any coordination with other committees." After calling for public comment, Chair Supervisor Asha Safai said she would move to continue the matter. "I'm going to make a motion to continue this item to the call of the chair," Safai said, and the motion was carried "without objection." No public speakers addressed the item.

The action means the committee did not take final action on the proposed ordinance at the June 13 meeting. The committee agenda was completed and Safai adjourned the meeting.

Meeting details: the Rules Committee convened June 13, 2018; Vice Chair Supervisor Norman Yee and member Supervisor Catherine Stephanie were identified on the dais; Victor Young served as clerk. Jim Smith and Charles Kremenak of SF Gov TV were acknowledged as media staff.

The committee did not record a roll-call vote for the continuance; the motion was made and accepted on the record "without objection." No dates were set in the meeting record for when the item will return to the committee.