Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the MTA Reform topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rules Committee pauses MTA overhaul amid heavy public input from taxi and transit stakeholders

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee · January 17, 2018
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supervisors proposed a charter amendment to shift parking and traffic authority from SFMTA to a new Livable Streets Commission and department; the committee heard extensive testimony from taxi drivers, bicycle advocates, disability and neighborhood groups and agreed to continue the item for further stakeholder consultation, especially with the taxi industry.

The committee considered Item 7, a charter amendment to eliminate the Municipal Transportation Agency's (SFMTA) jurisdiction over parking and traffic regulations, vest legislative authority in the Board of Supervisors, and create a Livable Streets Commission and Department to manage parking and traffic.

Sponsors (Chair Safaii and Supervisor Peskin) described the proposal as a response to neighborhood frustration with SFMTA decision-making and a desire to restore legislative checks and balances for everyday parking, traffic, and pedestrian-safety decisions. They said the measure is intended to be implemented using the existing MTA board and to improve responsiveness for local issues such as stop signs and traffic-calming measures.

Public comment was extensive and polarized: taxi industry representatives and medallion holders described the MTA takeover and medallion-sales program as destructive to the taxi industry and urged the Board to regain regulatory authority; disability advocates, transit riders and bicycle- and pedestrian-safety groups warned that creating a separate department and commission could bloat city government and harm coordinated transit planning, calling for more targeted reforms rather than wholesale structural change. Supervisors acknowledged the divergent views and agreed to continue the item to hold additional conversations with taxi stakeholders and other impacted parties.