Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Parks Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rules Committee continues proposed charter amendment to guarantee baseline parks funding to January 14
Summary
After lengthy public comment, the Rules Committee voted to continue consideration of a proposed charter amendment that would establish an annual baseline appropriation for the Park, Recreation and Open Space Fund and add planning and accountability requirements; the committee will review amendments on Jan. 14 to meet election deadlines.
The Rules Committee of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors on Thursday continued consideration of a proposed charter amendment that would create an annual baseline appropriation for the Park, Recreation and Open Space Fund and require additional planning and accountability by the Recreation and Park Department.
Supervisor Mark Farrell, sponsor of the measure, told the committee the amendment is intended to stabilize funding for the city’s parks, reduce the department’s vulnerability to general fund cuts and create a stronger planning regimen. Farrell said the measure would provide roughly $350 million in gross new funding for Rec and Park over 15 years and would pair funding with strategic, operational and capital planning requirements subject to public review.
The committee heard extended public comment from residents and parks advocates. Matt O’Grady and Kelly Nice of the San Francisco Parks Alliance, and Rachel Norton (director of policy and communications at the Parks Alliance), urged the committee to move the measure forward while praising recent amendments that add equity and planning language. Speakers including Dennis Moskofian, Ron Proctor and Dee Seligman pressed for firmer language prioritizing maintenance and explicit protections or earmarks for tree and deferred-maintenance spending, arguing the current draft lacks specific spending priorities.
Deputy City Attorney John Gibner advised the committee on the municipal schedule for charter amendments, noting the regular filing deadline for the February election is Feb. 23 and describing the committee and board steps needed to meet that deadline. Given the schedule, the committee agreed to continue the item to the Jan. 14 Rules Committee meeting so sponsors could finalize amendments, with an additional Rules meeting on Jan. 28 available to keep the item on track.
Supervisor Farrell moved to continue the item to Jan. 14; the motion was seconded and taken “without objection.” Chair John Avalos said his office and Farrell’s would work with stakeholders and staff to refine language before the next meeting. The committee’s continuance preserves the option to amend the proposal before the committee and full board meet to decide whether to place the amendment on the ballot.
Provenance: Item introduced and discussed (topic introduced SEG 209; extensive public comment SEG 334–983; legal timeline and procedural guidance provided SEG 940–971; motion to continue SEG 923–979).
