Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rules Committee appoints three members to Park, Recreation and Open Space Advisory Committee
Summary
The Rules Committee unanimously approved three appointments to the Park, Recreation and Open Space Advisory Committee (ProSAC) after brief public endorsement from Rec and Park staff and the Parks Alliance; the appointments will be considered by the full board on Jan. 12, 2016.
Get email alerts on the Appointments Parks topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee on Thursday appointed three people to the Park, Recreation and Open Space Advisory Committee, commonly known as ProSAC, following brief public endorsements from neighborhood and parks advocates.
Chair John Avalos called Item 1 and the clerk, Derek Evans, reported three seats were open with three applicants. Robert Brust introduced himself and described two years of service on ProSAC and his work on the department’s five-year strategic plan and emphasis on land acquisition and preventative maintenance. Richard Rothman asked to be reappointed to the District 1 seat and outlined his role as a liaison between Rec and Park staff and Richmond District residents. Patricia Delgado submitted written materials and did not appear in person.
Speakers from the parks community urged the committee to approve the nominees. Linda De Vero, chair of ProSAC, told the committee the nominees were “strong, willing workers” who attend meetings and serve on subcommittees. Phil Ginsburg of the Recreation and Park Department praised the applicants as committed park advocates.
Supervisor Avalos asked for a motion. The committee moved, seconded and approved the appointments “without objection,” and the clerk said the appointments would appear on the Board of Supervisors agenda on Jan. 12, 2016. The committee’s action forwards the nominees to the full board for final confirmation.
The committee did not debate substantive policy changes as part of the appointments. The committee adjourned the item and moved on to other business.
Provenance: The committee called the item and heard applicant remarks and public endorsements during Item 1 of the meeting (topic introduced at SEG 027; public endorsement and motion through SEG 206).
