Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rules Committee advances mayoral and board appointments to city commissions and advisory bodies
Summary
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee on April advanced a series of mayoral and board appointments — recommending Debbie Meslow for the Commission on the Status of Women, approving Antonio Diaz for the Energy Efficiency Coordinating Committee with a residency waiver, and forwarding multiple reappointments and new members for early-childhood and community-development panels.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee moved forward a slate of mayoral and supervisor appointments and reappointments on a crowded agenda that stretched across veterans, housing, community development and early-childhood panels.
The committee gave a positive recommendation for Debbie Meslow to the Commission on the Status of Women after Meslow described years of public-service experience, including work on human-trafficking legislation while in the district attorney’s office and state attorney general’s offices and private-sector experience at Gap. “I’m honored to be appointed by the mayor to the San Francisco Commission on the Status of Women,” Meslow said while outlining plans to increase private-sector engagement with the commission. Vice Chair Katie Tang moved to approve the appointment and the committee amended the motion to forward it as a committee report; the motion was seconded and taken without objection.
The committee also advanced the mayor’s appointment of Antonio Diaz to the Energy Efficiency Coordinating Committee and supported a residency waiver needed for his appointment. Diaz, who represents People Organizing to Demand Environmental and Economic Rights (POWER), highlighted his work on environmental justice in Mission and Excelsior neighborhoods and argued that the committee’s work should benefit low-income communities through jobs and lower energy bills. Supervisors granted the residency waiver and moved Diaz’s appointment to the full Board as a committee report with no objection.
On veterans’ appointments, the committee heard extended testimony from applicants including John Caldera and Dr. (first name not specified in the record) Koppel, who described veterans-focused training and outreach programs. The committee placed a recommendation in support of Sam Pandey for an open Veterans Affairs Commission seat after supervisors referenced past presentations and community endorsements.
The Rules Committee addressed several seats on the Citizens Committee on Community Development (CCCD). Peter Cohen, a current member with housing and grant-experience, received support for reappointment; the committee also recommended appointing Petrina Hall to a separate CCD seat and agreed to continue one CCD seat so an absent applicant could appear at the next meeting.
First 5 San Francisco reappointments were forwarded as a committee report. Candidates for the First 5 Children and Families Commission — all incumbents or reappointments — outlined work on preschool expansion, developmental screening and family-resource center networks. Laura Klumach, executive director of First 5 San Francisco, addressed the committee in support of the reappointments.
A large portion of the meeting was devoted to creating the new Office of Early Care and Education (OECE) Citizens Advisory Committee. Dozens of applicants presented for nine seats representing family childcare providers, center-based programs, philanthropy and higher education. After public endorsements and deliberation, supervisors moved a slate of board-appointed candidates — Kim Garcia Meza (family childcare/provider seat), Kathy Herrera Autumn (center-based seat), Candace Wong (seat representing childcare planning) and Sandy Blackman (CPAC representative) — and supported the mayor’s proposed appointees for the remaining OECE seats. The committee took those recommendations as a committee report and forwarded them to the full Board.
Most actions at the Rules Committee were adopted as committee reports and advanced to the full Board of Supervisors; the record indicates motions were generally taken “without objection” where noted. The Rules Committee closed by confirming no further business and adjourning.
What happens next: the full Board of Supervisors will consider the committee reports and the mayoral nominations at the next Board meeting; items continued by the committee were scheduled for later hearings where absent applicants can present.
Sources: Committee hearing record and public testimony to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee.
