Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Utilities Capital Projects topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Supervisors ask for updated financing analysis on proposed PUC office at 525 Golden Gate

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee · November 7, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Supervisors continued an appropriation to the full Board after PUC staff described a $190 million administrative building project at 525 Golden Gate and said $33.5 million in land‑sale proceeds would be applied now; supervisors asked staff to analyze debt‑service capacity for remaining Certificates of Participation before the project proceeds.

The Budget & Finance Committee on Nov. 7 heard a presentation by the Public Utilities Commission on plans to build a new 240,000‑square‑foot administrative office at 525 Golden Gate and continued the appropriation until staff provides updated financing analysis.

Tony Irons, deputy general manager of the PUC, said the project is "very nearly ready to go forward" and described financing that would rely principally on avoided rent savings, about $50 million in surplus land‑sale proceeds and debt instruments. He said the total project cost including site work and fees was approximately $190,000,000.

Supervisor Aaron Peskin and other committee members pressed staff on whether the project had identified all financing sources and asked for an updated analysis of Certificates of Participation (COPs) and the PUC's revenue capacity to support any debt service. "I just worry about putting all this money into a project when there's still a funding gap," Peskin said, asking staff to coordinate with the budget analyst before the Board acts.

A member of the public, Jim Hass, urged the supervisors to proceed, saying demolishing a long‑vacant structure in the civic center would improve neighborhood safety and activate the area. The committee agreed to continue the item to the call of the chair to allow the budget analyst to complete the requested analysis.