Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Fiber topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Supervisors probe feasibility of city‑owned fiber; DTIS and agencies outline needs and next steps

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Budget and Finance Committee · March 7, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A consultant study and presentations from DTIS, MTA, PUC, DPW and public‑safety agencies kick off multi‑agency work on a possible municipal fiber broadband network; committee asked departments for more detailed feedback and continued the item.

The Budget & Finance Committee held an in‑depth hearing on the feasibility of a municipal fiber broadband network and departmental needs.

Supervisor Tom Ammiano said the March hearing is the first in a series intended to turn a 2004 resolution into an actionable plan. Brian Roberts of the Department of Telecommunications and Information Services (DTIS) summarized the city’s internal fiber projects (about 65 miles installed across multiple initiatives) and the Fiber WAN project to connect dozens of city buildings for internal data services.

DTIS explained the difference between internal networks (city operations) and public‑facing networks (municipal broadband) and outlined policy goals including universal affordable access, open access to encourage competition and minimizing right‑of‑way impacts. He said a prior contract for a larger study had partially spent an allocation; the study work is being resumed and the department expects to return with a vendor recommendation and additional detail.

Various city agencies described specific needs. The Municipal Transportation Agency said it expects extensive fiber needs for new ITS (intelligent transportation system) deployments, signal and transit facility connections and for moving from leased T1s to city fiber to reduce recurring costs. The Department of Public Health noted telemedicine, high‑resolution imaging and voice‑over‑IP as potential uses; Office of Emergency Services discussed fiber redundancy and public‑safety broadband (including a prospective public‑safety 4.9 GHz network). The PUC and DPW stressed coordination on major capital and street‑cutting projects so fiber placement can be bundled with other infrastructure work.

Public commenters and community groups urged broader needs analysis, more community outreach and connections to libraries, schools and digital‑inclusion goals. Several civic advocates recommended the committee collect lessons learned from other municipal networks and ensure the consultant’s scope includes demand and market analysis.

The committee asked DTS/DTIS and other agencies to provide a written response and more complete asset topology within a month to help the consultant complete a final CTC study; supervisors indicated they will continue hearings and asked departments to identify specific buildings, trenching costs and coordination opportunities (for example, aligning fiber work with the sewer master plan).

What happens next: DTIS and agencies will return with a more detailed written response for the committee and the consultant will finalize the study after receiving departmental input. The item was continued to the call of the chair.