Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Shelter Monitoring topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Shelter Monitoring Committee warns of understaffing, data gaps; Rules Committee advances two nominees and continues others
Summary
Committee chair Nicholas Kimura told the Rules Committee that the shelter-monitoring program needs more staffing, better data collection and clearer enforcement; city staff said $2 million was added last year to shelters and invited supervisors to schedule site visits. The committee advanced two shelter nominees and continued two seats due to posting requirements.
The Rules Committee received the Shelter Monitoring Committee's quarterly report and discussed recommendations aimed at improving oversight of city-contracted shelters.
Nicholas Kimura, chair of the Shelter Monitoring Committee, said roughly one-quarter of client-generated complaints were forwarded for investigation, about 20% were closed when clients said they were satisfied, and that 57% of complaint records listed no contact information for the client. The report identified staff treatment and facility conditions as the main complaint types and recommended growing the committee's staffing from one to two full-time positions to meet statutory investigation timelines; committee staff reported an average response time of 29 days.
Kimura urged better data collection, including tracking disability status and turnaway counts (the committee cited an estimate of 6,000 homeless individuals and 1,134 shelter beds). He also said standards of care are effectively an unfunded mandate and asked the Board's support for legislative changes to align resources with requirements.
Joyce Crum, director of the Housing and Homeless Division at the Human Services Agency, told the committee that the Board had added $2,000,000 to shelter providers in the prior budget cycle and invited supervisors to schedule site visits (the agency's largest shelter is at 1001 Polk Street) to view conditions.
On appointments, the committee heard multiple candidates for four openings. Deborah Muse and Raya Freeman spoke to their experience; supervisors raised residency and posting-notice questions. Staff told the committee that seats 4 and 5 had not been posted for the required 10 days, so the committee moved to continue those seats to the call of the chair; supervisors waived the residency requirement for seat 6 (Raya Freeman) and advanced other nominees to the Board.
What happens next: staff will work with the Board's legislative analysts on staggered terms and draft proposals to improve data collection and enforcement; seats 4 and 5 will be heard at a later date once posting requirements are satisfied.
