Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Mayoral Question Time topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rules Committee advances ordinance to implement mayoral Q&A requirement, with clerk deadlines amended

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee · February 17, 2011
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee moved an ordinance forward to implement a voter-approved charter amendment requiring monthly mayoral appearances; clerical amendments were added to set deadlines for submitting questions and to remove the board president from question-review duties.

The Rules Committee advanced an ordinance on Feb. 17 to amend the Administrative Code and establish a process for the mayor to appear monthly before the Board of Supervisors, implementing a charter amendment approved by voters last November.

President Hsu described the measure as intended to foster "good government, open dialogue and transparency," and said the ordinance was drafted "in consultation with the mayor." He said the charter requires monthly mayoral appearances and the ordinance seeks to ensure those appearances are used for substantive policy discussion rather than soundbites.

The Clerk recommended several technical edits, including gender-neutral language and shifting the deadline for submitting questions to 12 noon on Wednesdays so the clerk can prepare the agenda materials. The Clerk also proposed that only the board president communicate rescheduling requests to the clerk when agendas remain in draft.

Public comment included opposition from Thomas Picarello, who argued the ordinance imposes too many restrictions on supervisors’ questions — saying the requirement to prepare questions a week in advance and time-limited questioning amounts to a prior restraint. Supervisor Ellsberg moved to adopt the president’s technical amendments but to remove the board president from the question-review language, transferring review authority to the clerk. That amendment was seconded and the committee moved the ordinance forward with the agreed edits "without objections." The ordinance will return to the full Board for consideration.