Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Voting Task Force topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rules Committee reopens Brent Turner voting-task-force seat after heated testimony over conduct and expertise
Summary
After hours of mixed public testimony — with supporters praising Brent Turner’s election transparency work and critics alleging bullying and threats — the Rules Committee voted to reopen the Voting Systems Task Force seat and allow additional applicants, continuing the item to the call of the chair.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee on Monday moved to reopen consideration of a nomination to the city’s Voting Systems Task Force after a heated public hearing that split neighborhood activists, computer experts and supervisors.
Brent Turner, the nominee, addressed the panel and denied wrongdoing, saying he had “never been charged with anything in my life” and apologizing for past profanity in emails and voicemails. He called the controversy a “smear campaign” and urged supervisors to consider his experience pressing for open-source, auditable election systems.
Supporters who spoke during the two-hour public comment period credited Turner with years of election observation, grassroots organizing and advocacy for transparent voting technology. “This task force wouldn’t have come into being without his efforts,” one backer told the committee. Other witnesses — including people who said they had worked alongside Turner — described bullying, demeaning conduct and, in a few cases, behavior they characterized as threatening. Several speakers said those concerns led them to leave local groups rather than confront the issue publicly.
Supervisors wrestled with how much of the testimony rose to the level of disqualifying conduct. District 9 Supervisor (committee member) described the process as “junior-high schoolish” and urged reliance on evidence rather than allegations alone. Supervisor Chiu noted the committee lacked the means to determine the truth of contested claims at the hearing and suggested widening the applicant pool to ensure a diverse, collegial task force.
The committee voted without objection to reopen the seat to additional applicants and to continue the matter to the call of the chair to allow the city to follow notice requirements and let the city attorney and clerk advise on next steps. That leaves the final decision pending and gives the board time to weigh both the technical expertise Turner’s supporters say he brings and the committee’s concerns about temperament and collaborative capacity.
The Voting Systems Task Force was created after controversy over procurement and the use of proprietary software in local voting machines. Supporters of open-source systems argue they improve transparency and auditability; opponents and some procurement experts warn that open-source code also requires configuration, support and specification work to make it usable by election administrators.
The committee’s vote means the seat remains open while supervisors consider whether to accept Turner’s nomination or select a local resident or another applicant. The committee did not take a final vote on appointment during Monday’s meeting.
