Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Homelessness topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Supervisors hear shelter-monitoring report citing access gaps, 64 complaints and funding pressure

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee · December 4, 2008
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Rules Committee received the Shelter Monitoring Committee’s quarterly report documenting 64 complaints between July 1 and Sept. 30, gaps between reported vacancies and people turned away, and a recommendation to protect emergency homeless services amid looming budget cuts.

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee on Dec. 9 heard a detailed quarterly report from the Shelter Monitoring Committee that documented persistent problems in the city’s emergency shelter system and warned that midyear budget cuts could worsen access.

Quentin Mackey, chair of the Shelter Monitoring Committee, told the committee that for the July 1–Sept. 30 reporting period the committee conducted 14 site visits and received 64 complaints, with 43% of the complaints centered at Multi-Service Center South. "For that period ... we received 64 complaints," Mackey said, noting concerns about food quality, staff treatment and transport to distant shelters.

Mackey and several public speakers said a central problem is a mismatch between the city’s reservation system and what people actually encounter. The committee reported that the city’s changes system shows roughly 5%–10% vacancies while frontline staff and shelter-seekers continue to be told late at night that no beds are available. Mackey recommended guaranteeing transportation — tokens or map-van service — to ensure people can reach available beds.

Hospitality House program director Jenny Wiley provided operational data that illustrated the strain. She said the Tenderloin Self Help Center typically saw about "230 unduplicated people a day" (roughly 800 visits daily), and that the week after Tenderloin Health reduced morning hours the center saw "about 260 people" and the following week "about 488 unduplicated people," evidence, she said, of rising demand where supply has waned.

Advocates described sharp increases in first-time shelter seekers and long waits for families. Jennifer Friedenbach of the Coalition on Homelessness told the committee the centralized family wait list had doubled since the previous year and many families were living in cars or otherwise precarious situations. She also said service providers were reporting that two out of three single adults seeking shelter were being turned away.

On funding and implementation, Mackey said the committee had $200,000 in add-back funds available for the fiscal year and proposed using the money to finance a nutritionist through the Department of Public Health and mandated staff training; he also urged that emergency homeless services be excluded from any midyear cuts. HSA staff responded that vacancy rates have trended as low as 5%–10% in recent months (down from typical historical rates of 20%–25%), reported new beds added at NextDoor and Interfaith-based rotations, and acknowledged ongoing challenges making tokens and transport available at frontline hours.

Supervisors and committee members did not adopt an immediate policy change but agreed to file the Shelter Monitoring Committee report and to keep the issue under review as the city faces potential budget reductions. The committee also continued consideration of appointments to the Shelter Monitoring Committee to allow identification of multilingual members and to preserve continuity on implementation work.