Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Campaign Transparency topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rules Committee advances ordinance requiring campaign consultants to disclose lobbying contacts

Rules Committee, Board of Supervisors · October 2, 2008
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Rules Committee voted without objection to send to the full Board an ordinance that would require registered campaign consultants to report lobbying contacts with city officers and staff and adds a definition of 'staff person' to guide the ethics commission’s implementing regulations.

The Rules Committee moved without objection to forward to the full Board an ordinance that would require registered campaign consultants to disclose lobbying contacts with officers and staff of the City and County of San Francisco.

Mister Owen, the item presenter, said the measure "plugs a loophole" in the city's ethics laws by creating a new reporting category for lobbying activities by campaign consultants and described a newly added definition of "staff person" in the draft that will guide the Ethics Commission's regulations. He said the definition is on page 3 of the draft amendment and is intended to include those who file conflict-of-interest disclosures under article 3, chapter 1 of the city's campaign and governmental conduct code.

Supervisor support for the measure was voiced during committee discussion and a member asked that the item be sent as amended with a recommendation to the full Board. The chair re-opened the item during the same meeting to accept forthcoming redline amendments and directed the city attorney to prepare changes pursuant to a memo submitted by Supervisor Maxwell's office.

Committee members took the motion without objection, meaning the ordinance will be considered by the full Board with the committee's recommendation and the planned amendments.

Next steps: the ordinance will go to the full Board as a committee report with the committee's recommended amendments; the Ethics Commission will later draft regulations implementing the "staff person" definition and reporting procedures.