Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Utilities Appointments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Rules Committee moves several PUC nominations to full Board after questioning on local experience and CCA
Summary
The Rules Committee advanced multiple mayoral appointments to the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission to the full Board — some with recommendation, some without — after extended questioning of nominees about sewer retrofit projects, community choice aggregation (CCA) and ratepayer protections. Public testimony included both endorsements and allegations about past PUC conduct.
The San Francisco Board of Supervisors' Rules Committee on a special morning session advanced several mayoral appointments to the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (PUC) to the full Board, after supervisors pressed nominees on local experience, the sewer retrofit environmental review and community choice aggregation.
Nora Vargas, the mayor’s nominee for the ratepayer/consumer-advocate seat, told the committee she ‘‘support[s] community aggregation’’ and described her background as executive director of the Latino Issues Forum and prior roles defending limited-English-speaking residents before utility regulators. Vargas said she would ‘‘gather the information, do an assessment, and provide the opportunities for public hearings’’ before deciding on specific capital or operational actions as a commissioner.
Deputy City Attorney Cheryl Adams summarized the five seat descriptions adopted by voters under the charter amendment (Prop E): experience in environmental policy and environmental justice (seat 1); ratepayer/consumer advocacy (seat 2); project finance (seat 3); technical expertise in water or power systems (seat 4); and one at-large appointment (seat 5). Supervisors repeatedly asked nominees to explain how their expertise matched those seat definitions and how they would handle large capital programs such as the city’s clean-water retrofit and sewer projects.
Public commenters offered mixed views. Jessica Treboich of the Jewish Community Relations Council and several community leaders praised Vargas’s community outreach and consumer-advocacy experience. By contrast, speakers including Francisco de Costa and Tony Kelly raised concerns about whether some nominees had sufficient local knowledge of historic PUC controversies and, in Kelly’s words, alleged ‘‘private campaign’’ activity that he said undermined City energy policy.
On procedural outcomes, the committee agreed — without objection in some instances and by motion in others — to forward several nominations to the full Board. The record shows the committee will move item 6 (Francis X. Crowley) forward with recommendation and move items 8 and 9 (Nora Vargas and the companion rejection item) forward without recommendation, while tabling or withdrawing other nominations as noted on the agenda.
The committee emphasized that the nominated commissioners would be responsible for oversight of multi-billion-dollar projects and for weighing voter-directed initiatives on clean energy and public power. Multiple supervisors told nominees they expected them to consult with both staff and neighborhood groups and to demonstrate independence from appointing authorities when making decisions affecting ratepayers.
The committee did not make final confirmations; the nominations will return to the full Board for final votes.
