Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Of Conduct topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates proposed code of conduct; sponsors incorporate feedback and continue discussion to September
Summary
Supervisors extensively debated a proposed code of conduct and rules‑of‑order amendments that would define censure and sanctions; concerns about vague language and scope prompted the sponsor to incorporate suggested edits and continue consideration in the next Rules Committee meeting.
Supervisor sponsor presented an ordinance to amend the Board's rules of order by incorporating a code of conduct, clarifying procedures for admonition, sanction and censure, and setting a two‑thirds threshold for any censure decision. The proposed rules define prohibited conduct and provide processes for admonition and censure but drew sustained questions from colleagues about vague terms such as "indirectly," "improper," and "offensive behavior." Several supervisors recommended qualifying language (for example, inserting "endeavor to") and cautioned against expansive coverage that might reach private life or create de facto criminal processes.
The city attorney and other supervisors suggested edits to align the proposal with the Charter and to avoid ambiguity that could chill normal political debate. The sponsor said the ACLU's concerns had been considered and that the text was revised accordingly; the chair said the item would be continued to the first Rules Committee meeting after recess for broader input and drafting revisions.
Outcome: The committee agreed to continue consideration of the code of conduct and to circulate revisions to all supervisors before the next Rules Committee meeting.
