Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Appointments topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rules Committee advances Mike Sullivan—s Recreation and Park nomination to the full board without recommendation

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Rules Committee · May 31, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee heard a lengthy nomination presentation and broad public support for Michael Sullivan—or the Recreation and Park Commission; supervisors agreed to forward the appointment to the full Board without a committee recommendation and tabled related motions.

The Rules Committee considered Mayor—s appointment of Michael Sullivan to the Recreation and Park Commission. Sullivan introduced his background: law school, two decades of volunteer work with Friends of the Urban Forest, service on the Urban Forestry Council (2003'005), authorship of The Trees of San Francisco, and a focus on parks equity, maintenance and outreach.

Supervisors asked Sullivan about operational priorities and community equity. When asked "What are you gonna do about bathrooms?" Sullivan said improving restroom cleanliness and security is a priority for families and noted the issue has been long-standing. He said he would separate his prior activist roles from the obligations of an appointed commissioner and would approach privatization proposals on a case-by-case basis, supporting public resources while acknowledging partnerships with nonprofits can add capacity.

A broad roster of nonprofit and neighborhood leaders endorsed Sullivan during one-minute public comments. Endorsers included the San Francisco Parks Trust, the Neighborhood Parks Council, Friends of the Urban Forest volunteers, and multiple neighborhood association representatives; they cited his tree expertise, volunteer service and neighborhood ties.

A committee member said he intends to support Sullivan at the full Board but proposed moving Item 2 forward without a committee recommendation so other supervisors could review the nominee. Supervisor Ammiano agreed to that process; the committee therefore directed that Item 2 be sent to the full Board "without recommendation". The clerk also noted Items 3 and 4 (motions rejecting the appointment or taking no position) remained on the agenda but were tabled for the moment.

No committee vote on the appointment was recorded in the hearing; the next procedural step will be the Board packet when the nomination appears before the full Board.