Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Taxi Commission Appointment topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee forwards Patricia Breslin’s taxi reappointment amid debate over hotel-industry ties

San Francisco Board of Supervisors Committee (Appointments and Administration) · March 15, 2007
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee forwarded the mayor’s reappointment of Patricia Breslin to the Taxi Commission without recommendation after supporters highlighted hospitality experience and critics raised conflicts tied to hotels steering passengers to limousines.

The committee considered three linked motions on the mayor’s reappointment of Patricia Breslin to the Taxi Commission: approve, reject, or take no position. After debate and public testimony, the committee forwarded the approval motion to the full Board without recommendation and tabled the others for further consideration.

Patricia Breslin, the hospitality-seat nominee and executive director of the Hotel Council of San Francisco, outlined her 30‑plus years in the local hospitality industry and said she represents the public‑interest hospitality seat that was intended by the Taxi Commission’s design. Supporters cited her efforts on accessibility and taxi stand improvements and her work with neighborhoods. Opponents, led in public comment by Mark Gruber and other taxi-industry advocates, argued Breslin’s hotel-industry ties create an appearance of conflict: they said hotel doormen steer passengers into limousines and criticized the nominee for defending hotel practices in prior commission discussions.

Supervisors discussed enforcement options and penalties for hotel steering and agreed to forward item 2 (the mayor’s reappointment) to the full Board without committee recommendation so supervisors could register positions publicly at the Board meeting. The committee noted that overturning a reappointment would require a supermajority at the full Board, and that further policy work on enforcement options and penalties could be pursued separately.