Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission urged denial of Second Avenue church rezoning; council debated tabling and denial
Summary
At a public hearing, the city planning commission recommended rejecting a conditional-use rezoning for a church at 357 Second Avenue SE, citing the regional planning commission's report, absence of applicants at the planning meeting, and spot-zoning concerns; the council debated tabling the item and then moved to deny the rezoning.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
At a public hearing on a conditional-use request for a church in the C2 Highway Commercial District at 357 Second Avenue Southeast (tax map T20, parcel 145), Howard Throver III, speaking for the city planning commission, told the council the commission had delivered a "pretty much a no vote" and explained three reasons: the regional planning commission report recommended rejection, the applicants were not at the planning meeting so questions could not be asked, and an existing nearby church had not gone through the process — raising spot-zoning concerns.
"There were 3 basic reasons that brought our discussion to an end," Howard Throver III said, summarizing the planning commission's rationale and telling the council that the recommendation was not unanimous. During council discussion members suggested tabling the item to allow the applicants additional time to appear before the planning commission, but a procedural motion to table "to the first meeting after the next planning and zoning meeting" was made, seconded and later described by the chair as failing.
A council member then moved to deny the rezoning; the motion was seconded and discussion followed about missing setback information, acreage and other zoning criteria. The recorded segments do not include a detailed roll-call vote transcript for the denial motion in the provided excerpt, so the formal final recorded outcome in these segments is not fully specified.
The council did not enter final findings on the record during the recorded segments and staff recommended any further procedural steps (such as returning the item to planning) if the council desired additional review.
